Today I came across a comparison test at AutoBILD.de where the Anabolikafraktion Compact, a rendezvous was. were part of the team Audi S3, BMW 130i, Ford Focus ST, Mazda 3 MPS, Opel Astra OPC and VW Golf R32.
neutral, while still under controlling
The tester Gerald Czajka noted at the outset that all candidates are too uncomfortable for everyday use. And are also soon realize that he has no idea of the vocabulary. Thus, the performance of the S3 as a "broadly neutral over all four wheels to the outside pushing" section. Mr. Czajka is probably not clear that neutral handling either over-or understeer, it being the latter more than the Audi clearly disclosed, as it pushes to the outside ... yes
advantage here: The mention of the pathetic boot, had to soft-wheel drive - a drawback (to chalk is also the R32), although this was never mentioned when I think of other tests in other magazines. It is also the word "cool", which Audi describes quite accurately and succinctly.
When Mazda will catch the eye of the comment that the steering "tight" and "strange tough" is. Not as strange as that comment, I think. What will that mean then? A more precise statement would not have been bad. The rest is fine, not over-represented an understatement. That the 260 hp front-wheel drive with differential lock itself hopelessly asking for is any reasonably ensure clear understanding. Why Mazda has not built all-wheel drive?
The BMW comes off well in terms of performance. The everyday utility is still swept under the carpet - he does not exist ie. A brief flash of the potential criticism of this car: Direct for car rides steering. To this day I ponder about what this will be because 1er oh so much better than the 3 Series Compact.
Where is the trunk?
we come to the VW R32, which seems to be well sprung at worst. But if it is to be a sports car (hence probably the Bockel hard suspension), then how come he has no motor sport, brings in higher engine speeds or performance? The old VW's disease ... Ironically, the weakness of the construction of small trunk is not covered here, just like with the 130i before.
A little out of place does the Focus ST, already, like a knife in a gunfight. But that's not the fault of the car and remedy is in sight as the new Focus RS is waiting in the pipeline.
The Opel gets his fat away pretty well, since its driveability is probably quite a chunk that wants to be first dealt times. The above criticisms run through the entire press (and international), so that certainly covers the image. The exterior like about the tester, as well was intended - unlike BMW (sigh), Audi and VW have been left outside (look like cars stop).
Finally, I miss them, as almost always, the mention of the fuel type, which is the power guns for anybody. Ford extends only to the Super 95 RON, to approve all other high-octane Super Plus - ouch. And you're behind and do not necessarily smarter, you should have asked in advance seriously what car is probably best could take every day to live with.
neutral, while still under controlling
The tester Gerald Czajka noted at the outset that all candidates are too uncomfortable for everyday use. And are also soon realize that he has no idea of the vocabulary. Thus, the performance of the S3 as a "broadly neutral over all four wheels to the outside pushing" section. Mr. Czajka is probably not clear that neutral handling either over-or understeer, it being the latter more than the Audi clearly disclosed, as it pushes to the outside ... yes
advantage here: The mention of the pathetic boot, had to soft-wheel drive - a drawback (to chalk is also the R32), although this was never mentioned when I think of other tests in other magazines. It is also the word "cool", which Audi describes quite accurately and succinctly.
When Mazda will catch the eye of the comment that the steering "tight" and "strange tough" is. Not as strange as that comment, I think. What will that mean then? A more precise statement would not have been bad. The rest is fine, not over-represented an understatement. That the 260 hp front-wheel drive with differential lock itself hopelessly asking for is any reasonably ensure clear understanding. Why Mazda has not built all-wheel drive?
The BMW comes off well in terms of performance. The everyday utility is still swept under the carpet - he does not exist ie. A brief flash of the potential criticism of this car: Direct for car rides steering. To this day I ponder about what this will be because 1er oh so much better than the 3 Series Compact.
Where is the trunk?
we come to the VW R32, which seems to be well sprung at worst. But if it is to be a sports car (hence probably the Bockel hard suspension), then how come he has no motor sport, brings in higher engine speeds or performance? The old VW's disease ... Ironically, the weakness of the construction of small trunk is not covered here, just like with the 130i before.
A little out of place does the Focus ST, already, like a knife in a gunfight. But that's not the fault of the car and remedy is in sight as the new Focus RS is waiting in the pipeline.
The Opel gets his fat away pretty well, since its driveability is probably quite a chunk that wants to be first dealt times. The above criticisms run through the entire press (and international), so that certainly covers the image. The exterior like about the tester, as well was intended - unlike BMW (sigh), Audi and VW have been left outside (look like cars stop).
Finally, I miss them, as almost always, the mention of the fuel type, which is the power guns for anybody. Ford extends only to the Super 95 RON, to approve all other high-octane Super Plus - ouch. And you're behind and do not necessarily smarter, you should have asked in advance seriously what car is probably best could take every day to live with.
0 comments:
Post a Comment